Welcome to WEAP's Website WEAP
WEAP is an initiative of the Stockholm Environment Institute.


About WEAP

Home
Why WEAP?
Features
What's New?
Sample Screens
Demonstration
Publications
History and Credits

Using WEAP
Download
Licensing
User Guide
Tutorial
Videos (YouTube)

User Forum
Discussions
Members List
Edit Profile

Additional Support
Training
University Courses
Collaboration

About Us
SEI-US Water Resources Program
Please Contact Us

LEAP
Interested in Energy?
Read about LEAP: SEI's software for energy planning.

Link WEAP and LEAP for combined Water-Energy planning.
Watch a video demo!
   

User Forum

All Topics | Topic "Rational Allocation"
Log in to post new messages or reply to existing messages.
 
Author Message
Dr. Mehdi Mirzaee

Subject: Rational Allocation   
Posted: 1/11/2006 Viewed: 36604 times
Rational Allocation Mehdi Mirzaee MMirzaee <a href="mailto:M.Mirzaee@wri.ac.ir">M.Mirzaee@wri.ac.ir</a>I want to make a relationship to allocating water. e.g. :
if Q of River<5 cms then link outflow=2 cms

or something like this.

Deleted User

Subject: RE: Rational Allocation   
Posted: 1/21/2006 Viewed: 36594 times
RE: Rational Allocation Jack Sieber jgsieber <a href="mailto:jack.sieber@gmail.com">jack.sieber@gmail.com</a>I'm not quite sure what you want to do. Allocations are based on demands
(and supply available)--are you saying that the demand is function of
streamflow, or that the amount available to allocate is a function of
streamflow? Obviously, you cannot allocate more water than is available. For
example, if Q < 2 CMS, then you cannot allocate 2 CMS.

WEAP will try to allocate such that all demands are satisfied, with
preference to the highest priority demands. If your intent it to make sure
that a certain minimum flow is maintained in the river, you could achieve
this goal with a minimum instream flow requirement, immediately below the
outflow point for the link. If the flow requirement had a higher priority
than the demand, then it would be satisfied before any water was withdrawn.
For example, if the flow requirement was 3 CMS, then a flow of 5 would allow
at most 2 CMS to be allocated. A flow of 4 would allow at most 1 CMS.

Jack
Dr. Mehdi Mirzaee

Subject: RE: Rational Allocation   
Posted: 1/23/2006 Viewed: 36582 times
RE: Rational Allocation Mehdi Mirzaee MMirzaee <a href="mailto:M.Mirzaee@wri.ac.ir">M.Mirzaee@wri.ac.ir</a>I didn't mean that. I wanted to know that is it possible that define a withdrawal water by an exprision or not. some thing like writing codes, as LINGO.
Mr. Jack Sieber

Subject: RE: Rational Allocation   
Posted: 1/24/2006 Viewed: 36572 times
RE: Rational Allocation Jack Sieber jsieber <a href="mailto:jsieber@tellus.org">jsieber@tellus.org</a>No, it is not possible to define an expression, as a function of streamflow, that will determine how much to withdraw from the river.

Jack
Topic "Rational Allocation"