Welcome to WEAP's Website WEAP
WEAP is an initiative of the Stockholm Environment Institute.


About WEAP

Home
Why WEAP?
Features
What's New?
Sample Screens
Demonstration
Publications
History and Credits

Using WEAP
Download
Licensing
User Guide
Tutorial
Videos (YouTube)

User Forum
Discussions
Members List
Edit Profile

Additional Support
Training
University Courses
Collaboration

About Us
SEI-US Water Resources Program
Please Contact Us

Environmental News
'Subterranean estuaries' crucial to sustainable fishing and aquacultur...
Pioneering research suggests 'subterranean estuaries' may be critical in managing sustainable fishing and aquaculture --...

Chemicals from human activities in transplanted oysters far from popul...
Wastewater treatment facilities clean the water that goes down our sinks and flushes our toilets, but they do not remove...

Antarctic Circumpolar Current flows more rapidly in warm phases
Our planet's strongest ocean current, which circulates around Antarctica, plays a major role in determining the transpor...
Source: Science Daily
LEAP
Interested in Energy?
Read about LEAP: SEI's software for energy planning.

Link WEAP and LEAP for combined Water-Energy planning.
Watch a video demo!
   

User Forum

All Topics | Topic "Glacier Module"
Log in to post new messages or reply to existing messages.
 
Author Message
Ms. NAHIDA ALI

Subject: Glacier Module   
Posted: 3/4/2016 Viewed: 9159 times
Hi,
I am using WEAP Model in glacierized watershed but not gettinh good relationship between simulated and observed discharge as in Feb and march simulated discharge is very much high than observed even if i change melting point of snow more than the temperature in feb and march still maximum snow melt in these months...what can i do regarding this? which parameters i can calibrate to get good correlation?
secondly, ice melt temperature is kept default ranging from -10 to 10 Celsius Is there any specific reason for this can this be increase?

Thanks
Topic "Glacier Module"