Selamat Datang di Situs WEAP
WEAP
WEAP adalah sebuah insiatif dari Stockholm Environment Institute.


Tentang WEAP

Beranda
Mengapa WEAP ?
Fitur
Apa yang Baru ?
Contoh Screen
Contoh Demo
Aplikasi
Publikasi
Sejarah dan Kredit

Menggunakan WEAP
Unduh
Lisensi
Bantuan Penggunaan
Tutorial
Video
Sumber

Forum Pengguna
Diskusi
Daftar Anggota
Sunting Profil

Penunjang Tambahan
Pelatihan
Program Universitas
Kolaborasi

Tentang Kami
SEI-US Program Sumberdaya Perairan
Silahkan Hubungi Kami

 Berita Lingkungan
LEAP Tertarik pada Energi?
Baca tentang LEAP: Software SEI untuk perencanaan energi

Forum Pengguna

Seluruh Topik | Topik "Modelling Issues With Hydrology"
Masuk untuk mengirim pesan baru atau membalas pesan yang ada.
 
Penulis Pesan
Alexandros Psomas

Subjek: Modelling Issues With Hydrology   
Dikirim: 10/9/2011 Dilihat: 3124 times
- Hydrology

Using the FAO Rainfall-Runoff method means that there's only one parameter (Effective Precipitation), for which I have to estimate values (or have PEST calibration do this for me, if I have a rough idea of the needed values). Is there any idea where to find credible literature for Effective Precipitation values? In addition, from what I understand, the main drawback of the method is the fact that it does not calculate transfer of soil water from month to month. According to your experience, could this be a major issue for not using the method?

Alternatively, picking the Soil Moisture method means that I have to estimate 6-7 parameters (or have PEST do this for some of them). Again where should I look for the needed values (soil water capacity, root zone conductivity, preferred flow direction, runoff resistence factor, irrigation lower/upper threshold)? Is there any 'good practice' that I should follow? That is, which of them would you estimate and which ones would you let PEST calibrate? Moreover, concerning 'root zone conductivity', is it the hydraulic conductivity of the upper soil layer?

Topik "Modelling Issues With Hydrology"